18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 /0%	Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 /81%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R16	R14 - R17	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78

3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 28

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14x

3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 10x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 1.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2.

Worst position in test

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 12.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14.

Average position in tests

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 4.2

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 5.5

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2025

3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 2018

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2

85%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

84%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Wet handling

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 90%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet braking

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 79%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 88%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 92%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 86%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

Wet performance

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 83%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 B

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 82%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry driving behavior

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 67%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Dry performance

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Dry handling

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 85%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2

86%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 87%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 89%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 83%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 89%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 87%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2

77%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

73%

Mileage

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 74%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 72%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 91%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Price/value

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 60%

Rolling resistance

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 C

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

78%

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2

74%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 68%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 65%

Interior noise

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

0%

Ice braking

1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 78%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands