Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport Maxx RT Premium2. Pirelli P ZERO Premium3. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium4. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium5. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Dunlop SP Sport Maxx RT vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
4. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
3. Pirelli P ZERO 6.065. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Dunlop SP Sport Maxx RT Recommended5. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended4. Dunlop SP Sport Maxx RT Recommended5. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT Rating: Recommended | 8,3 | 7,9 | 8,3 | 10 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Highly recommended | 9,3 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 7,7 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 8,9 | 8,8 | 7,9 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 7,6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
