Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium2. Double Coin DC100 Lowcost
Comparison: Double Coin DC100 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Double) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Double (0%). But when it comes to comparing Double Coin DC100 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4S , the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Double Coin DC100 was done in 2025, compared to 2024 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 245/35 R19 test, where both the Coin DC100 and the Pilot Sport 4S were tested.
| # | Double Coin DC100
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R23 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Double Coin DC100 Rating: Not recommended | 5 | 5- | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
