Segment
1. Firestone Firehawk Sport Upper-middle2. Double Coin DC100 Lowcost
Comparison: Double Coin DC100 vs. Firestone Firehawk Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Double) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Double (0%). The first tyre test of Double Coin DC100 was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Firestone Firehawk Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 245/35 R19 test, where both the Coin DC100 and the Firehawk Sport were tested.
| # | Double Coin DC100
| Firestone Firehawk Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Firehawk Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Firehawk Sport Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Double Coin DC100 Rating: Not recommended | 5 | 5- | |||||
| Firestone Firehawk Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 3- | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
