Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Debica Presto Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto vs. Nokian Line
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Debica (58%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto and Nokian Line, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto and the Line were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Debica Presto has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Line has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto
| Nokian Line
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Debica Presto 16.2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Debica Presto | 38,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Nokian Line | 37,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
