Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Debica Presto Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Debica (58%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto and Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Debica Presto has B wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Debica Presto Lowcost
2. Debica Presto 16.
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Debica Presto | 38,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||