Segment
1. Debica Presto Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto vs. Fulda EcoControl HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Debica (58%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto and Fulda EcoControl HP, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto and the EcoControl HP were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Debica Presto dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Fulda EcoControl HP also have B wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto
| Fulda EcoControl HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Debica Presto 16.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Debica Presto | 38,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 36,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
