Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Debica Presto Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Debica (58%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Presto was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto and the Turanza T001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Debica Presto dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Bridgestone Turanza T001 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Debica Presto 16.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Debica Presto | 38,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
