Segment
1. BF Goodrich g-Grip Upper-middle2. Debica Presto Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto vs. BF Goodrich g-Grip
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF). Generally, BF summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Debica (58%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto and BF Goodrich g-Grip, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto and the Goodrich g-Grip were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Presto
| BF Goodrich g-Grip
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R15 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Debica Presto 16.
Average position in tests
2. BF Goodrich g-Grip 19.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Debica Presto | 38,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 37,8 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 152 | 18 | 38 | 39 | |||
| Debica Presto | 133 | 48 | 43 | 42 | |||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 130 | 46 | 44 | 40 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
