Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Debica (56%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP2
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,8 | 27,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||