Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Debica (58%). The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP2 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (81%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP2
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
