Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Debica (58%). The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP and the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Debica Presto UHP has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto UHP
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
