Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle4. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
