Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle4. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
