Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Debica (58%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto UHP and Bridgestone Potenza S001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Potenza S001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP and the Potenza S001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Debica Presto UHP has C wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Bridgestone Potenza S001 has B rating.
| # | Debica Presto UHP
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
