Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Debica (58%). In this particular case, the Nexen N Fera Primus has a better rating of 66% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the N Fera Primus were tested.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Nexen N Fera Primus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 3,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
