Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Debica (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4+ has a better rating of 76% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin Primacy 4+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Primacy 4+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Primacy 4+ also have A wet ratings.
# | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Michelin Primacy 4+
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | |||||
Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,2 | |||||
Show test details |