Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Linglong (43%). In this particular case, the Linglong Sport Master has a better rating of 72% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Sport Master were tested.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 | 36.4 | 33.1 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||