Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Debica (56%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 72% compared to 51% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||