Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 73% compared to 70% of the Debica Presto HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.
# | Debica Presto HP2
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | 2,3 | ||||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
Show test details |