• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 73% compared to 70% of the Debica Presto HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

# Debica Presto HP2
/70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
/73%

Add to comparison

Debica
Kumho
DimensionsR15 - R17 R14 - R18
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Debica Presto HP237,430,2
Kumho Ecsta HS5235,4 26,1
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impact
Best values in test1,3
Debica Presto HP2
Rating: Good
2,3
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
2,72,3
Show test details