Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2021 | 205/55 R16 | View |
The comparison between two summer tyres, the Debica Presto HP2 and the BFGoodrich Advantage, shows distinct differences that can assist potential buyers in making an informed decision.
The Debica tyre performs reasonably well across different test platforms. It ranked 16th in the Autobild test out of a total of 53 tyres. This shows a notable level of dependability. Advantages mentioned for the Debica Presto HP2 include its price/value ratio, making it a good budget choice. Autobild 2024 mentioned its beneficial environmental impact, good lifetime, wear resistance and efficiency. However, the test signalled slight imbalances and weaknesses in driving safety. Overall, our rating for the Debica Presto HP2 is 79%.
On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage came in slightly lower in the Autobild test, securing 18th position. It scored particularly well in comfort and dry handling categories, where it was singled out twice for its performance. Autobild 2024 highlighted its dynamic dry handling, low rolling noise, low rolling resistance and affordable price. It lost points for its tendency to understeer in wet conditions. The BFGoodrich Advantage earned an overall rating of 68% from us.
In the ADAC test, both tyres presented a difference in placement, with Debica Presto HP2 securing the 15th position and BFGoodrich Advantage scoring slightly lower, taking the 21st position out of 50 tyres. Despite neither tyre ending up in the top 10, both showed reasonable performance, although the Debica Presto HP2 seems to have a slight edge.
To summarize, the Debica Presto HP2 seems to be a good choice for price-sensitive buyers looking for a tyre with good environmental features and acceptable safety performance. The BFGoodrich Advantage provides a comfortable ride and great dry handling, but might be less suitable for regions with a lot of rain due to its tendency to understeer in wet conditions. Both tyres do not seem to be replaced with newer models currently, but stay tuned for future updates.
Performance comparison
Debica Presto HP2
BFGoodrich Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
BFGoodrich Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
BFGoodrich Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
BFGoodrich Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
BFGoodrich Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
BFGoodrich Advantage
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
