Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Debica (56%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto HP and Nokian Line, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Presto HP and the Line were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Debica Presto HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Line has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto HP
| Nokian Line
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP Lowcost
1. Nokian Line 17.
1. Nokian Line 12.17
1. Nokian Line Good
1. Nokian Line Good
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP | 37,4 | 40,7 | |||||
| Nokian Line | 37,5 | 38 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||