Segment
1. Debica Navigator 3 Lowcost2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Fulda MultiControl
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda allround tyres are slightly better rated (4%) than Debica (0%). The first tyre test of Debica Navigator 3 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Fulda MultiControl first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Navigator 3 and the MultiControl were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Debica Navigator 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (88%) of the Fulda MultiControl also have C wet ratings.
| # | Debica Navigator 3
| Fulda MultiControl
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Debica Navigator 3 | 44.1 | 56.4 | |||||
| Fulda Multicontrol | 45.0 | 57.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
