Segment
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Debica Frigo HP2 17.335. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good3. Barum Polaris 5 Good4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory5. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory4. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 38.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37.9 | 28.1 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36.9 | 28.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 33,5 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
