Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Debica (50%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 67% compared to 50% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings.
| # | Debica Frigo HP2
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
2. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||