Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Debica (50%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 50% compared to 41% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Performance comparison
Averaged from 2 tests
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Debica Frigo HP2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
