In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Debica (50%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 6 has a better rating of 63% compared to 50% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the ALPIN 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin ALPIN 6 also have B wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 2 tests
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Debica Frigo HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.