Segment
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo HP and Yokohama W.drive V905, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Yokohama W.drive V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frigo HP and the W.drive V905 were tested.
| # | Debica Frigo HP
| Yokohama W.drive V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R17 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP Lowcost
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP | 41,1 | - | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 39,9 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||