Segment
1. Debica Frigo HP Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Matador (40%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo HP and Matador MP92 Sibir Snow, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frigo HP and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested.
| # | Debica Frigo HP
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Debica Frigo HP Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP | 41,1 | - | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||