Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Debica (50%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo HP and Kumho WinterCraft WP51, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frigo HP and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested.
| # | Debica Frigo HP
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP | 41,1 | - | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
