Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Debica Frigo HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Debica (50%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo HP and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frigo HP and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested.
| # | Debica Frigo HP
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R17 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Debica Frigo HP Lowcost
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP | 41,1 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||