Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Debica (50%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo 2 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
| # | Debica Frigo 2
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 88%
2. Nokian WR D4 82%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||