Segment
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Premium2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Debica (50%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ has B rating.
| # | Debica Frigo 2
| GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory
