Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Debica (50%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo 2 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Debica Frigo 2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (92%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 3 also have C wet ratings.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2018 | 175/65 R14 | View |
Performance comparison
Debica Frigo 2
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Debica Frigo 2
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Debica Frigo 2
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Debica Frigo 2
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Debica Frigo 2
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
