In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Debica (50%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo 2 and Dunlop SP Winter Response 2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the SP Winter Response 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 has B rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2018 | 175/65 R14 | View |
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Debica Frigo 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Debica Frigo 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Debica Frigo 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Debica Frigo 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Debica Frigo 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Debica Frigo 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Debica Frigo 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.