Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Debica (50%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
| # | Debica Frigo 2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
