Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Nokian Powerproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than CST (58%). But when it comes to comparing CST Medallion MD-A1 and Nokian Powerproof, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the Powerproof were tested.
| # | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
