Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than CST (57%). The first tyre test of CST Medallion MD-A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested.
| # | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
