Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than CST (58%). But when it comes to comparing CST Medallion MD-A1 and Falken Azenis FK510, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of CST Medallion MD-A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 | 38,1 | 34,8 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
