Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than CST (58%). The first tyre test of CST Medallion MD-A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 | 38,1 | 34,8 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||