Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than CST (57%). The first tyre test of CST Medallion MD-A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
CST Medallion MD-A1 Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2 | ||||
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
CST Medallion MD-A1 | 38,1 | 34,8 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,6 | 30,9 | |||||
Show test details |