Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle3. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Dry steering response
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Sufficient | 3,3 | 3,6 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
