Segment
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
Table of contents:
| # | Cooper Zeon CS8
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Cooper Zeon CS8 and the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 are two tyres that go head to head in various tests and reviews. Each of these tyres are representative of their respective manufacturers, Cooper and Laufenn. Both are renowned for their distinctive design and technological innovations that appeal to drivers.
Constructed in Great Britain, the Cooper Zeon CS8 tyre has an overall rating of 34%. Coined as a summer tyre, this tyre's strengths lie in its performance on wet surfaces. One of the remarks from the ADAC 2017 test acknowledges the tyre's decent performance on wet terrain. However, it was also noted that the Cooper Zeon CS8 showed significant weaknesses on dry surfaces and a notably poor environmental balance. Furthermore, it was marked down for a short mileage range and poor abrasion, efficiency, and sustainability. In the ADAC and Autobild tests, the Cooper Zeon CS8 ranked 33rd and 27th out of 50 and 51 tyres respectively. This tire has been replaced with a newer model.
The Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 doesn't have an assigned overall rating. Nonetheless, it manages to trump the Cooper Zeon CS8 in the Autobild test ranking 21st out of 51 tyres. Despite its better ranking in this particular test, it was placed at a lower 39th position in the general ADAC test. This indicates a considerable difference in performance and may hint at certain specific strengths and weaknesses that each test highlights. Unfortunately, specific strengths and weaknesses from diverse tests are not provided. Notedly, this tyre also has a newer version.
In summary, both the Cooper Zeon CS8 and the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 tyres have demonstrated mixed performances in mutual tests. The Cooper Zeon Cs8 shows good performance on wet surfaces but lacks balance and has an inferior environmental profile. Overall, it seems the Laufenn appears to be a more solid choice considering its performance in the Autobild test. However, without more prototype details and broader test outcomes, any conclusion on which tyre performs better overall would be speculative.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Sufficient | 3,3 | 3,6 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Rating: Sufficient | 3,9 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 65.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 66.3 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 39,1 | 31,3 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 36,5 | 31,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
