Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle3. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 65.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 59 | 25.3 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 67.7 | 30.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
