Segment
1. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Cooper (31%). The first tyre test of Cooper Zeon CS Sport was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Zeon CS Sport and the Powerproof were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Cooper Zeon CS Sport
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Cooper Zeon CS Sport 17.33
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Satisfactory
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Cooper Zeon CS Sport | 36 | 34,5 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
Cooper Zeon CS Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,5 | ||
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |