18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R18	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

93%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Price/value

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands