18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Vredestein Wintrac

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Vredestein Wintrac /56%

Dimensions	R14 - R18	R14 - R19	R15 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. Vredestein Wintrac Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

3. Vredestein Wintrac 38

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

3. Vredestein Wintrac 11x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Vredestein Wintrac 3.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Vredestein Wintrac 17.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Vredestein Wintrac 8.36

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

3. Vredestein Wintrac 2024

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

3. Vredestein Wintrac Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Vredestein Wintrac Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

Vredestein
Wintrac

71%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 76%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 72%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 64%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 66%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

81%

Vredestein
Wintrac

77%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Wet braking

1. Vredestein Wintrac 78%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 64%

Wet handling

1. Vredestein Wintrac 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 68%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Vredestein Wintrac 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Vredestein
Wintrac

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Dry braking

1. Vredestein Wintrac 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. Vredestein Wintrac 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

79%

Vredestein
Wintrac

77%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Vredestein Wintrac 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 73%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 63%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84%

Vredestein
Wintrac

67%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Vredestein Wintrac 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 60%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 57%

Price/value

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Wintrac

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Continental WinterContact TS 870	37.1	29.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Vredestein Wintrac	37.3	30.2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good	2,1	2,3	2,2	2,5	1,8	3,0	2,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,6	2,0	2,5	2,4	2,7	2,0
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Satisfactory	2,1	2,4	2,7	2,4	2,4	2,8	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2-	2+	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Continental WinterContact TS 870	34,2	27,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Vredestein Wintrac	33,5	30,3
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Very good	8,2	7,9	7,9	8,4	10	10
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	7,8	6,6	7,4	10	5	9
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Very good	8,1	7,8	8,5	8,2	7	9
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Vredestein Wintrac

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands