18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Nokian WR Snowproof P /67%	Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R17 - R21	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Premium

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 124

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 55

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 9x

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 7x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 4.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 5.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 18.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 20.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 7.44

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 9.71

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 2025

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 2019

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

88.5%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

64%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

61%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

73.8%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

58%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

49%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

92%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

83%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

83.7%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

76%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

66.4%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

72%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

66%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

62%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 E

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.7%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

0%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

0%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	1.7
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2.2
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory	2.5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,6	25,5
Nokian WR Snowproof P	36	26,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2+	1-	3
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2-	2
Show test details