18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Michelin ALPIN 6 /63%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R15 - R20	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 76

Number of tests

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 31x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 2024

Best rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

86%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

85%

Snow traction

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 95%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 87%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 81%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 80%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

84%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

Wet braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 63%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 86%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 55%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

90%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

62%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

58%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.7%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

0%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

0%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

85.7%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autozeitung Winter tyre test 2024 215/55 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	392
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Highly recommended	382
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: -	356
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2.5	2.3
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2	2.3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,6	25,5
Michelin Alpin 6	34,1	26,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2+	1-	3
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands