• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Apollo Aspire XP Winter

# Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
/93%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
/64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
/95%
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
/49%

Add to comparison

Continental
Fulda
GoodYear
Apollo
DimensionsR16 - R22 R15 - R19 R14 - R22 R16 - R18
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

6

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+1–1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Rating: Good
2+ 22+2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
3–22+2
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Rating: Good
2221
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impact
Best values in test1.7
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Rating: Good
2.2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
2.4
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Rating: Good
1.7
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
Rating: Poor
2.7
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetSnow
Best values in test32.627.1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P35.628.0
Fulda Kristall Control HP236.928.0
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 332.6 28.5
Apollo Aspire XP Winter37.328.7
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test22.1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Rating: Good
2.52.3
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
2 2.9
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test31,429,2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P34,930,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP237,430,7
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 333,930,1
Apollo Aspire XP Winter37,233,0
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P34,625,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,826,3
Show test details